MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Favorable Risk Group Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Children and Young Adult Treated in Uniform Protocol in Casablanca, Morocco. a Preliminary Analysis

2015· article· en· W2547395346 on OpenAlexaff
Marielle Igala, Mouna Lamchaheb, Nisrine Khoubila, Siham Cherkaoui, Bouchra Oukache, N. Hda, Uma H. Athale, Asmaa Quessar

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytarabineMedicineEtoposideDaunorubicinPediatricsMyeloid leukemiaInternal medicineLeukemiaSurgeryChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with in developing countries is challenging. In Morocco, the major causes of therapy failure are delay in diagnosis, early (prior to start of therapy) and induction deaths, induction failures and abandonment of therapy. Improvement of supportive care with particular focus on prevention and management of infection and improved transfusion support is crucial for better overall outcome. Aim of the study: To evaluate the preliminary results (Complete remission, OS and EFS) in children and young adults with favorable risk group AML treated in a single center with AML MA 2011 protocol. Patients and methods: From January 2011 to December 2014, a uniform treatment protocol was conducted to treat patients with age ≤ 30 years with de novo AML with favorable risk group. The diagnosis was done according to FAB classification, MPO done systematically. Karyotype was performed on marrow sample (20 metaphases analyze at least), R banding technique. Patients with hyperleukocytosis (WBC≥ 50G/L) received as a pre-phase 4 days of hydroxyurea to 50mg/kg/day then 2 inductions and 3 consolidations. The two courses of induction associated Cytarabine (100mg/m² q 12h (day 1-10)), Daunorubicin (50 mg/m² (day 2, 4, 6) for the first course, on days 1, 3, 5 for the second course) and etoposide (100mg/m² only at second course of induction). The consolidation included Cytarabine (3g/m²q 12h (day1-3) for first and second course and 1 g/m² (day1-3) on third course) plus Daunorubicin (30mg/m² (day 3-4 and day 1-3) at the first and third consolidation. L-Asparaginase 6000UI/m² on day 4 was give at second consolidation. Patients received CNS prophylaxis. The supportive care consisted of transfusion, antibiotic and patient and family education by hygiene team. Results: 39/159 patients (24.5%) had a favorable prognosis. They were 13 female and 26 male (Male/Female ratio of 2) with a median age of 21 years and the peak frequency was between 20-30 years (21 patients or 53.8%). Two groups were identified. (Table 1) The means WBC were 39.741 G/L (1.134-425.000G/L) and more than 50 G/L for 17 patients. t(8; 21) represented 71.8% of karyotype and was associated 14 times with other abnormalities: 8 loss of sex chromosome (6 -Y and -X 2), 2 deletions, 2 trisomy and 2 add. Inv16 or t (16; 16), 28.2% of case, was associated with a deletion once and once with trisomy. (Table 1) Molecular biology carried 7 times was positive in 4 cases all AML-ETO. Three patients died before treatment, two in hospital by septic shock (1), subarachnoid hemorrhage (1) and one at home. 36/39 patients were evaluable for the protocol. 17 patients with WBC > 50G/L received hydroxyurea prior to chemotherapy with good response for 16 (94.1%) and 1 (5.9%) death. The median average time from start of treatment was 15 days with a range of 1-52 days. After the two inductions 26 (74.3%) obtained a complete remission, 2 (5.7%) were in failure, and 7 (20%) died in hospitalization during induction 1. The cause of death was: 2 hemorrhage, 3 infections, 1 pulmonary embolism and 1 patient died at home. Conclusion: Therapeutic results are yet far from satisfactory. Complete remission could be improved with reduction of infection toxic deaths. Improvement of supportive care therapy may allow treating patients with intensified treatment with better outcome. Hydroxyurea is efficient to reduce WBC and for best conditions to initiate induction therapy. Table 1. Patient's characteristics All patients Group 1(age ≤15years) Group 2(age≥16 years) Number (%) Median age (Years) 39 (100%) 21 9 (23%) 10 30 (77%) 24 Male/Female 2 3.5 1.7 WBC>50000 (G/L) 17 2 7 FAB M1/M2/M4/M4Eo/other Immunophenotype 12/19/2/4/2 28 (71.8%) 1/7/1/0/0 7 (25%) 11/12/1/4/2 21 (75%) t(8 ;21) 28 (71.8%) 8 (88.9%) 20(66.7%) t(8 ;21)+ other anomalies 14 (50%) 5 (62.5%) 9 (45%) Inv 16 or t(16 ;16)Inv16 or t(16 ;16) + other anomaliesTreatmentComplete remission DeathFailureCauses of death infection/Hemorrhage/otherOSES 11 (28.2%) 2 (18.2%) 36*(92.3%) 26 (72.2%) 7 (18%) 2 2/3/2 51% 30.9% 1 (11.1%) 1 (100%) 9 (100%) 8 (88.9%) 1 (11.1%) 0 0/1/0 10 (33.3%) 1 (10%) 26 (86.7%) 18 (69.2%) 6 (23.1%) 2 (7.7%) 2/2/2 *One death after prephase Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207