MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract B047: Combining natural killer T cell immunotherapy with chemotherapy induced immunogenic cell death to target post-surgical breast cancer metastasis

2016· article· en· W2547397748 on OpenAlexaffabout
Simon Gebremeskel, Kaitlyn Tanner, Lynnea Lobert, Brent Johnston

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityBeatrice Hunter Cancer Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunotherapyMedicineCancer researchMetastasisNatural killer T cellCancerCyclophosphamideGemcitabineBreast cancerMetastatic breast cancerImmunologyDendritic cellImmune systemT cellChemotherapyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Canadian women and the second leading cause of cancer deaths. Given that most mammary tumors are surgically resectable and over 90% of breast cancer-associated deaths are due to metastasis, new therapeutic strategies targeting metastasis are required. Natural killer T (NKT) cells are a rare population of immune cells that have been shown to limit primary tumor growth and target distant metastatic disease in various animal models. We have shown that NKT cell activation improves survival in a model of post-surgical metastatic breast cancer. We are now expanding this work to determine whether NKT cell activation can be combined with chemotherapies to improve outcomes. In our model, 4T1 mammary carcinoma cells were injected into the mammary fatpad of syngeneic BALB/c mice. Tumors were resected at day 12, and mice were treated with cyclophosphamide or gemcitabine. On day 17, NKT cells were activated by transfer of dendritic cells loaded with the glycolipid antigen α-GalCer. We also examined whether Gemcitabine or mafosphamide (active component of cyclophosphamide) would induce immunogenic cell death of 4T1 cells in culture. Chemotherapeutics did not affect NKT cell activation as measured by serum IFNγ levels. Treatment with cyclophosphamide, gemcitabine, or α-GalCer-loaded dendritic cells alone reduced metastasis and prolonged survival. Combined treatments significantly enhanced survival. NKT cell activation decreased the frequency and immunosuppressive function of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Treatments resulted in enhanced tumor specific immunity as surviving mice exhibited slower tumor growth following secondary tumor challenge. Gemcitabine and mafosphamide also increase the immunogenicity of cancer cells in vitro by increasing the exposure/release of MHCI, MHCII, CD1d, Calreticulin, HMGB1 and ATP. NKT cell activation therapy can successfully be combined with low doses of Gemcitabine or cyclophosphamide to enhance protection against tumor metastasis and recurrence. This work provides a clear rationale for combining chemotherapy with NKT cell immunotherapy to target metastatic disease in the clinical setting. Citation Format: Simon Gebremeskel, Kaitlyn Tanner, Lynnea Lobert, Brent Johnston. Combining natural killer T cell immunotherapy with chemotherapy induced immunogenic cell death to target post-surgical breast cancer metastasis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Second CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; 2016 Sept 25-28; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2016;4(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B047.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Immunology Research→Same topicImmune Cell Function and Interaction→French-language works237,207→