Actividades profesionales confiables (APROC): un enfoque de competencias para el perfil médico
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolLa implementacion de la educacion basada en competencias ha revolucionado de manera global la forma de aprender y ensenar medicina. Las competencias corresponden a las atribuciones que todo medico debe de poseer, y surgieron a partir de las Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists y el Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Para lograr su adquisicion, ha sido necesario implementar las actividades profesionales confiables (APROC), termino acunado por Ten Cate y Scheele, cuya finalidad ha sido vincular el concepto de competencias con la practica. Se trata de actividades clinicas que los aprendices deben realizar para lograr dominarlas sin supervision. El Milestone Project creado por el ACGME surgio para enriquecer las competencias, y cada especialidad debe definir las propias y decidir el nivel de desempeno que espera de sus alumnos en cada ano de la especialidad. Para lograr aplicar las APROC es necesario que su diseno sea acorde con los objetivos del plan de estudios y requisitos del perfil del graduado. Diversas instituciones educativas de diferentes paises han implementado este innovador modelo de ensenanza, entre los que destacan Canada, Estados Unidos, Reino Unido, Australia, Nueva Zelanda y Paises Bajos. El proposito de este articulo es difundir nuevas propuestas para la educacion medica que logren vincular el perfil de competencias con la practica clinica rutinaria, para que los facultativos logren empoderamiento de estas nuevas herramientas y las puedan aplicar de manera eficiente en la ensenanza de los estudiantes, y una de estas son las APROC. EnglishThe implementation of competency-based education has revolutionized the way of learning and teaching medicine globally. Competencies are the responsibilities that all physicians must possess; they emerged from the Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists (CanMEDS) and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). To achieve the acquisition of these competencies, it has been necessary to implement Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), term coined by Ten Cate and Scheele, its purpose has been to link the concept of competencies with the practice. EPAs are clinical activities that learners must carry out for master them without supervision. The Milestone Project created by the ACGME was founded in order to enrich the competencies, where each specialty should define their own and decide the level of performance expected of students in each postgraduate year of the specialty. To apply the EPAs it is necessary that its design is consistent with the objectives of the curriculum and requirements of the profile of the graduate. Several educational institutions in different countries have implemented this innovative model of teaching, including: Canada, United States of America, United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand and the Netherlands. The purpose of this article is to spread new proposals for medical education that link the competencies with the daily basis practice in medicine to allow clinicians to achieve empowerment of these new tools and can apply them efficiently to the teaching of students, being one of these tools the EPAs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".