MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547466793 · doi:10.1109/ias.2016.7731963

Rule-based data-driven analytics for Wide-Area fault detection using synchrophasor data

2016· article· en· W2547466793 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaodong Liang, Scott Wallace, Duc Nguyen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFault (geology)PhasorPhasor measurement unitElectric power systemReal-time computingFault indicatorComputer scienceGridFault detection and isolationPower (physics)SoftwareEngineeringData miningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synchrophasor technology, also known as Wide-Area Monitoring System (WAMS) technology, utilizes Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU) to monitor real-time system data, which can provide unique insights into the operation of a power grid. In this paper, a rule-based data-driven analytics method for wide-area fault detection in a power system using synchrophasor data is proposed. As a data-driven approach, this method relies on rules created using PMU measurement data, and does not require knowledge of the power system's topology and model. It can detect fault location (bus and line) and fault type for a particular fault event. Three common types of short circuit faults in a power grid, single-line-to-ground (SLG), line-to-line (LL), and three phase faults, can be identified using the proposed method. Fault thresholds used in rules are determined based on theoretical values and recorded PMU data during fault events in Bonneville Power Administration (BPA)'s large power grid. The proposed method is validated by comparing with the recorded field data for fault events provided by BPA. It is found that it can effectively detect most faults with a great accuracy. It has been developed into a software program, and can be readily used by utility companies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207