MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547502359 · doi:10.1002/9781119036821.ch12

A Complex Adaptive System of Systems Approach to Human–Automation Interaction in Smart Grid

2015· other· en· W2547502359 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetri netAutomationComputer scienceDynamismRealization (probability)GridProcess architectureComplex systemAutonomyNormativeArtificial intelligenceSoftware engineeringDistributed computingEngineeringEpistemologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter expresses three cognitive genres: descriptive genre, normative/prescriptive genre, and know-how genre. The descriptive genre introduces and discusses on the following disciplines: the core concepts of complexity, complex adaptive system (CAS) of systems (CASoS), the application domains of human-automation interaction (HAI) and adaptive autonomy (AA), especially in Smart Grid, and two implementation ideas of expert systems and Petri nets. The chapter describes the automation related notions, that is, automation and HAI, followed by the investigation of HAI models' evolution from the perspectives of dimensions and dynamism. The idea of AA is then introduced as a dynamic HAI scheme, followed by the classification of AA implementation methods. Petri nets are introduced as powerful tools for modeling complex systems (CxS). Finally, Petri net realization of the adaptive autonomy expert system (AAES) is presented, followed by a performance evaluation study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it