MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547533256

Juvenile Worlds of a “Born Free” Generation: Deracialisation Dynamics among Ex-townships Adolescents Attending School in Johannesburg

2013· article· en· W2547533256 on OpenAlex
Marie Jacobs, Jean-Paul Payet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAutrepart · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth Education and Societal Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisadvantagedPluralRacial hierarchySociologyContext (archaeology)Identity (music)Gender studiesHierarchyYouth cultureQuarter (Canadian coin)GeographyPolitical scienceRace (biology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article aims to analyse how different identity repertoires are articulated and negotiated by South African youth from disadvantaged background and belonging to the “lower” groups of the old apartheid racial hierarchy. It shows the diverse social experience of these teenagers, studied here in the context of schooling. From their point of view, the experience of adolescence turns out to be a path meandering between worlds in tension – school, church, street quarter, family, public areas – conveying contradictory values and norms that the youth handle in a plural way. Growing up in a risky environment is the concrete socialisation framework of these young people, but growing up away from racial inherited categories constitutes a symbolic challenge that allows their involvement in the youthful globalised culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it