MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547556084 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2008.4758009

Adaptive linear combiners a robust neural network technique for on-line harmonic tracking

2008· article· en· W2547556084 on OpenAlex
Abdelaziz Zouidi, Farhat Fnaiech, Kamal Al‐Haddad, S. Rahmani

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceFast Fourier transformHarmonicHarmonic analysisLine (geometry)Focus (optics)Component (thermodynamics)Power (physics)Artificial intelligenceControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringAlgorithmEngineeringMathematicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intelligent techniques of harmonic detection or estimation are nowadays of a great interest in power system applications, their ability to deal with high non-linearities attract researchers to investigate the performance of these methods mainly based on artificial intelligence namely using artificial neural networks (ANNs). In the literature many harmonic detection or estimation methods were presented, in this paper we focus on adaptive linear neuron (ADALINE) to estimate the fundamental component and selected harmonic content of a distorted signal compared to the fast Fourier transformation (FFT) algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207