MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547583220 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2016.7726715

Attack-aware RWA using knowledge of demand holding times

2016· article· en· W2547583220 on OpenAlex
Hongbo Zhao, Saja Al Mamoori, Arunita Jaekel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRouting and wavelength assignmentWavelength-division multiplexingComputer scienceComputer networkVulnerability (computing)MultiplexingTransparency (behavior)Routing (electronic design automation)Computer securityWavelengthTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Transparent Optical Networks (TONs), traffic is carried over end-to-end all optical connections, called lightpaths. Due to the increasingly high data rates and the vulnerabilities related to the transparency of optical networks, security issues in transparent wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) optical networks have become of great significance to network managers. In this paper, we consider the problem of attack-aware routing and wavelength assignment (RWA) in optical networks, for periodic scheduled traffic demands. We present an optimal mathematical formulation to solve the RWA for scheduled lightpath demands in such a way that the overall vulnerability to attacks is minimized for the set of lightpaths as a whole. Our simulations show that the proposed approach can lead to significant reductions in the attack-radius.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207