Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A complex network approach to protein folding is proposed, wherein a protein's contact map is reconceptualized as a network of shortcut edges, and folding is steered by a structural characteristic of this network. Shortcut networks are generated by a known message passing algorithm operating on protein residue networks. It is found that the shortcut networks of native structures (SCN0s) are relevant graph objects with which to study protein folding at a formal level. The logarithm form of their contact order (SCN0_lnCO) correlates significantly with folding rate of two‐state and nontwo‐state proteins. The clustering coefficient of SCN0s (CSCN0) correlates significantly with folding rate, transition‐state placement and stability of two‐state folders. Reasonable folding pathways for several model proteins are produced when CSCN0 is used to combine protein segments incrementally to form the native structure. The folding bias captured by CSCN0 is detectable in non‐native structures, as evidenced by Molecular Dynamics simulation generated configurations for the fast folding Villin‐headpiece peptide. These results support the use of shortcut networks to investigate the role protein geometry plays in the folding of both small and large globular proteins, and have implications for the design of multibody interaction schemes in folding models. One facet of this geometry is the set of native shortcut triangles, whose attributes are found to be well‐suited to identify dehydrated intraprotein areas in tight turns, or at the interface of different secondary structure elements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".