Biomimetic Light-Harvesting Antenna Based on the Self-Assembly of Conjugated Polyelectrolytes Embedded within Lipid Membranes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Here we report a biomimetic light-harvesting antenna based on negatively charged poly(phenylene ethynylene) conjugated polyelectrolytes assembled within a positively charged lipid membrane scaffold constructed by the lipid 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane (DOTAP). Light harvested by the polymers was transferred via through-space mechanisms to a lipophilic energy acceptor (the cyanine dye DiI) whose effective molar absorption was enhanced by up to 18-fold due to the antenna effect. Absorption amplification of DiI was found to be due primarily to direct energy transfer from polymers. The efficiency of homoenergy transfer among polymers was next probed by the membrane embedding fullerene derivative phenyl-C 61 -butryic acid methyl ester (PCBM) acting as an electron acceptor. PCBM was able to quench the emission of up to five polymers, consistent with a modest amount of homotransfer. The ability of the membrane to accommodate a high density of polymer donors without self-quenching was crucial to the success of electronic energy harvesting achieved. This work highlights the potential of lipid membranes as a platform to organize light-harvesting molecules on the nanoscale toward achieving efficient energy transfer to a target chromophore/trap.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".