MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547617727 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2016.7726712

Virtualized allocation performance analysis in 5G two-tier cellular networks

2016· article· en· W2547617727 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Hussein, Abdallah Moubayed, Serguei Primak, Abdallah Shami

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVirtualizationComputer networkMacroQuality of serviceCellular networkThe InternetDistributed computingOperating systemCloud computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enhancement of quality of services (QoS) parameters is a challenging requirement in the Fifth Generation (5G) networks. Delay sensitive applications such as voice over internet protocol, online gaming, and live video are easily affected especially in high data traffic with limited available resources. Moreover; virtualization in standard long term evolution (LTE) systems is considered as an integral promising solution in the next generation networking architecture. In this paper, we aim to enhance the delay performance of such applications by utilizing the extra resources available in two-tier cellular network architecture with macro- and micro-cells. Virtualization is considered by allowing users belonging to the macro-cell to be allocated resources of the micro-cell when located in the micro-cell range. The average delays for various traffic types are evaluated to verify the framework's performance effectiveness before and after resources sharing scenario. Simulation results show that the proposed framework considerably reduces UE's average delay when compared with the non-sharing scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207