MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2547686024 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2016.7729573

Sea state events in the marginal ice zone with TerraSAR-X satellite images

2016· article· en· W2547686024 on OpenAlexaff
Susanne Lehner, Johannes Gemmrich

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceGeologySea ice concentrationSea ice thicknessDrift iceSwellArctic ice packClimatologyWind waveCryosphereSatelliteArcticRemote sensingOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With ice properties being changed by the breakup of ice floes, the penetration of ocean waves into the marginal ice zone (MIZ) has a variety of potential effects on the global Earth and climate system. In the last decades, the wave propagation in ice has been studied by in situ measurements, satellite imagery, and laboratory experiments using ice tanks. As well, different theoretical models of the behaviour of waves in ice have been developed. We focus on events of long swell waves encountering the MIZ, mainly on the northern hemisphere. Images from the TerraSAR-X (TS-X) satellite are used to investigate the progression of waves and their behaviour in ice. The included TS-X scenes were acquired in Stripmap mode and are up to few hundred kilometres in length. In particular, the spatial variability of wave parameters through the MIZ is analysed. This yields valuable clues on the interaction between ocean waves and sea ice. Satellite Data acquired during the Sikuliaq Cruise into the Arctic are used to demonstrate the effect of sea ice and ocean wave interaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→