MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547801231 · doi:10.1109/aps.2016.7696112

SIW beamforming of 2 × 2 and 4 × 4 AFLTSA arrays for MMW applications

2016· article· en· W2547801231 on OpenAlexaff
Shraman Gupta, M. Akbari, Abdel-Razik Sebak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamwidthHFSSBeamformingAntipodal pointRelative permittivityAntenna (radio)Multi-mode optical fiberElectronic engineeringComputer scienceAcousticsPhysicsOpticsTelecommunicationsPermittivityDielectricOptoelectronicsEngineeringOptical fiberMicrostrip antennaMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a beamforming technique using multimode section based on s-parameters has been analyzed for antipodal fermi-linear tapered slot antenna (AFLTSA). The analysis is proposed for 2 × 2 and 4 × 4 sub arrays on Rogers 5880 substrate with a relative dielectric permittivity εr=2.2 in order to achieve an objective of high gain and narrow beamwidth, which can be used for target tracking and precise detection applications. The solution frequency is chosen as 32.5 GHz which yields 3 dB beamwidth of ~ 20° and ~13° for 2 × 2 and 4 × 4 AFLTSA structures respectively. The realized gain achieved for these two structures is 12.39 dB and 14.19 dB respectively. The simulation results for multimode section and sub array antenna structures are presented using Ansoft HFSS simulation tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207