MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547846366 · doi:10.1109/ias.2016.7731842

A novel DTFC based IPMSM drive with improved efficiency and dynamic performance

2016· article· en· W2547846366 on OpenAlexaff
Md. Mizanur Rahman, M. Nasir Uddin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)TorqueVector controlDirect torque controlEngineeringMATLABDigital signal processingSynchronous motorControl engineeringMRASComputer scienceInduction motorControl (management)Electronic engineeringPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel direct torque and flux control (DTFC) scheme of interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) drive. The conventional six-sector based DTFC scheme is modified with the proposed eighteen-sector based DTFC scheme in order to reduce the torque/flux ripple of the drive. Furthermore, the motor efficiency is optimized by reference flux estimation through an online loss minimization algorithm (LMA) so that the motor operates at minimum loss condition, which is not possible for conventional control where the reference flux remains constant. The complete drive is simulated using MATLAB/Simulink software and then a prototype is implemented using digital signal processor (DSP) board DS1104 for a laboratory 5-hp motor. Performance of the proposed DTFC scheme is investigated extensively at different operating conditions in both simulation and experiment. It is found from results that the proposed eighteen-sector based DTFC scheme incorporating LMA achieves the lowest possible torque ripples in steady state while maintaining high efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.163
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207