Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les conséquences de l'indulgence envers les plaisirs du toucher étaient le sujet d'un débat au cours du XVIe siècle. Alors qu'il était généralement admis que s'adonner aux plaisirs du toucher pouvait conduire aux dangers de succomber à plusieurs autres vices, entre autres le plus traître des péchés mortels, Luxuria, d'autres conceptions contemporaines mettaient en relation le sens du toucher avec la vertu. Un nouveau regard sur le développement du thème iconographique du sens du toucher qui a émergé au début du XVIe siècle, en particulier dans le traité didactique moralisateur Stultiferae naves de Jodicus Badius Ascensius (publié à Lyon en 1500), ainsi que dans les séries (datant des environs de 1544) de Georg Pencz — le Kleinmeister de Nuremberg —, révèle que ces ouvrages exprimaient cette ambivalence à l'égard du sens du toucher.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it