MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547966251 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2016.7726750

INS/GPS localization for reliable cooperative driving

2016· article· en· W2547966251 on OpenAlexaff
Samira Kaviani, Marie O’Brien, Jessica Van Brummelen, Homayoun Najjaran, David G. Michelson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersElse Kröner-Fresenius-StiftungSharif University of Technology
KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceReal-time computingInertial navigation systemMultipath propagationInertial frame of referenceComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cooperative driving improves vehicle safety and the driving experience by adapting the vehicle performance to the surrounding traffic. Communication of accurate and timely information obtained from multiple in-vehicle sensors, other vehicles and nearby infrastructure is essential to guarantee the robustness and reliable performance of the cooperative driving system. However, processing the information in cooperative systems is challenging because of the volume of the information, interaction of the vehicles, and increased sensitivity to reliable information due to potential liabilities and legal issues. In this research, we tackle the challenges associated with the reliability and accuracy of the vehicle position, velocity and attitude vector by fusing inertial navigation system (INS) and global positioning system (GPS) sensor data, resolving common GPS problems such as blockage and multipath. Being able to provide accurate and reliable sensor information is an important milestone in establishing a successful cooperative driving network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207