Actions associatives auprès des travailleuses du sexe (Portugal)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'article se concentre sur l'activité des organisations de la société civile oeuvrant dans le domaine de la prévention des IST au Portugal afin d'analyser la façon dont elles perçoivent les travailleuses du sexe et conçoivent les programmes d'aide sociale et de prévention des IST qui leur sont adressés. L'étude est basée sur une analyse qualitative de la production discursive de personnes qui travaillent dans ce domaine d'intervention. Les données recueillies ont permis d'identifier certains obstacles s'opposant à l'accès au système de soins de santé et à la prévention du VIH/sida et autres IST, ainsi que des discours et pratiques discriminatoires à l'égard de ces travailleuses du sexe. La dichotomie vulnérabilité / risque marque la figure de la travailleuse du sexe et le débat public autour du travail du sexe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".