MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2548128495

Mapping and Modeling of Variable Source Areas in a Small Agricultural Watershed

2015· dissertation· en· W2548128495 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kishorkumar Panjabi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil erosion and sediment transport
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWatershedVariable (mathematics)AgricultureGeographyWater resource managementEnvironmental scienceRegional scienceHydrology (agriculture)Computer scienceGeologyMathematicsArchaeologyGeotechnical engineeringMachine learning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modeling the spatiotemporal dynamics of Variable Source Areas (VSA) is challenging since VSAs depend on a number of factors such as soil properties, land use, water table, topography, geology and climatic conditions. In spite of these challenges, few encouraging attempts have been made to develop models for quantification and locating runoff generation areas based on VSA concepts. However, these approaches need to be validated with field tests for their feasibility and accuracy. This research is divided into four main sections. The first section discusses how an advanced, low cost, remotely controlled digital Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) system was developed to monitor and acquire climatic and hydrological data from a distantly located watershed. The developed WSN system was installed in a small agricultural watershed near Elora, Ontario and watershed observations of 45 rainfall events from September 2011 to July 2013 were collected. In the second section, significance of various climatic and hydrological factors affecting the spatiotemporal variability of runoff generating areas are explored. Analysis showed that the runoff generating areas were strongly influenced by the seasons and that rainfall amount was the most dominant factor affecting these areas, followed by initial soil moisture and rainfall intensity. The third section includes modification of an existing distributed CN-VSA method by incorporating seasonal variability of potential maximum soil moisture retention of the watershed. The simulations made with modified distributed CN-VSA predicted spatial extent of saturated areas more accurately in ways consistent with VSA hydrology. In the fourth section, an event based AGNPS model is reconceptualised based on VSA hydrology concept by incorporating the Topographic Wetness Index (TWI). This modeling approach demonstrates an easy method to predict the dynamics of VSAs by combining VSA hydrology with existing SCS-CN runoff equation. In this method, TWI was used in combination with land-use to define the CN values. The simulated results showed that in regions dominated by saturation excess runoff process, AGNPS-VSA model provides more realistic spatial distribution of runoff generating areas than the AGNPS model based on traditional SCS–CN method. This research will help to locate VSAs for applying targeted BMPs to control non-point source pollution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicSoil erosion and sediment transportFrench-language works237,207