MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2548128663 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2016.7726622

Energy harvesting for IoT sensors utilizing MEMS technology

2016· article· en· W2548128663 on OpenAlexaff
H. Rashidzadeh, P. S. Kasargod, Tareq Muhammad Supon, Rashid Rashidzadeh, Majid Ahmadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransducerEnergy harvestingMicroelectromechanical systemsElectrical engineeringVoltageUSableCadenceActuatorEfficient energy useDiodePower (physics)Electric potential energyComputer scienceElectronic circuitEnergy (signal processing)ElectronicsElectronic engineeringSmart transducerEngineeringMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing need for alternative sources to power sensors and portable devices has led to many power-scavenging solutions from ambient energy sources. As the technology scales down and the supply voltage drops, the complexity of power scavenging circuits increases. This paper presents a new transducer circuit utilizing MEMS technology together with a super-diode to convert ambient vibration energy to usable electrical energy efficiently. An integrated MEMS actuator containing a switch is used to eliminate the loss of efficiency due to the threshold voltage of diodes commonly used to implement electrostatic transducers. A super-diode has also been used to eliminate the need for synchronization while increasing the overall efficiency. Simulation results using Cadence design tools indicate an increased efficiency by more than 27% compared to the conventional electrostatic transducer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207