MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Retrospective Analysis of the Minimum Dosage Requirements for Enoxaparin in Neonates with Thromboembolic Disease.

2004· article· en· W2548373121 on OpenAlexaff
Fiona A. Punter, Patricia McCusker, Mary Seshia, Sara J. Israels, Blair Seifert

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLow molecular weight heparinGestational ageRetrospective cohort studySurgerySepsisThrombosisInferior vena cavaEnoxaparin sodiumPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract With advances in neonatal tertiary care, thromboembolic disease (TE) has become an increasingly recognized phenomenon. Enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin, is used widely in the treatment of TE in children. Current guidelines in the literature for enoxaparin therapy suggest a dosage of 1.5 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours for patients less than two months of age. However, our previous five-year retrospective review of the use of enoxaparin in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit indicated that this dose was insufficient to achieve a therapeutic heparin level in more than 50% of the neonates studied We describe the results of initiating therapy with a higher dosage of enoxaparin. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from patients treated with enoxaparin subcutaneously from January 2002 to July 2004. All patients were less than three months of post-natal age at the initiation of enoxaparin therapy. TE was documented in each of the patients using radiologic studies (ultrasound, echocardiography, or CT scan). Results: Twenty-five neonates were treated with subcutaneous enoxaparin for venous and arterial TE over a two year period. The gestational age of the neonates in the study ranged from 25–41 weeks, with 15 born before 37 weeks gestation. The neonates were treated for a variety of primary conditions, including congenital heart disease (12), complications of prematurity (9), sepsis (1), sagittal venous thrombosis (2), and one case of atypical Kawasaki disease. Radiologic investigations detected TE in the inferior vena cava (14), superior vena cava (2), aorta (3), atria (4), hepatic vein (4), sagittal vein (2), and blocked Blalock-Taussig shunt (2). Sepsis was present or suspected in 14/25 (56%) infants at the time of TE diagnosis. A total of 23 neonates (92%) received total parenteral nutrition at the time of TE. Central venous lines were in situ in 22 of 25 infants (88%). The first dosage of enoxaparin was at least 1.6 mg/kg/dose (based on actual body weight) in 18/25 (72%). Therapeutic heparin levels (0.5 –1.0 aXa units/mL) at first measure were achieved in 12/18 (67%) patients. By the time of the second measure of heparin level, 20/25 patients had dosages greater than 1.6 mg/kg/dose. Of those, 18/20 (90%) had reached a therapeutic heparin level. The dosage range to achieve a therapeutic heparin aXa was 1.42–2.2 mg/kg/dose (average 1.75 mg/kg/dose). Three infants whose doses were not maintained above 1.6 mg/kg/dose, because of weight changes, did not remain in the therapeutic range. The duration of therapy ranged from 1 to 6 months (median: 3 months). Two infants expired as a result of their primary illness. Their deaths were unrelated to the enoxaparin therapy. Three infants experienced minor bleeding while on enoxaparin. Conclusions: Higher doses of enoxaparin are needed to treat neonates with TE. We recommend an initial dosage of enoxaparin of 1.65–1.75 mg/kg/dose based on actual body weight for neonates with TE. This is a safe and effective dosage regimen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→