MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2548380795

Production scheduling and routing problem in the textile industry

2013· article· en· W2548380795 on OpenAlexaff
Nizar El Hachemi, Mohammed Saddoune, Issmaïl El Hallaoui, Louis-Martin Rousseau

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM), Proceedings of 2013 International Conference on · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColumn generationScheduling (production processes)SolverInteger programmingLinear programmingMathematical optimizationComputer scienceJob shop schedulingRouting (electronic design automation)AlgorithmMathematicsEmbedded system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we propose a two-phase solution approach to solve a combined routing and scheduling problem occurring in the textile industry where all fabrics are dyed by dye-jets and transported by forklifts. The objective is to minimize the cost of unproductive activities consisting of setup time due to dye-jets cleaning and forklifts waiting time. The first phase solves an integer linear program to assign jobs (fabrics) to dye-jets while minimizing the setup cost. We compare in this phase an arc formulation and a path-based formulation. In the second phase we use a mixed-integer linear program to deal with dye-jets scheduling and both routing and scheduling of forklifts. Experiments are performed on real data provided by a major multinational company and have been conducted using Cplex 12.4.0 and a column generation solver. Optimal solution is obtained in reasonable time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM), Proceedings of 2013 International Conference onSame topicVehicle Routing Optimization MethodsFrench-language works237,207