MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2548477800 · doi:10.1109/tic-sth.2009.5444501

A time-dependent agent-based model of an eco-product market with social interactions and dynamic game pricing schemes

2009· article· en· W2548477800 on OpenAlexafffund
Edward W. Thommes, Henry Thille, M Cojocaru, Dominic Nelson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDynamic pricingComputer scienceProduct (mathematics)Sequential gameGame theoryMicroeconomicsMulti-agent systemAgent-based modelEconomicsArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an agent-based model of an eco-product market from a system design perspective. The aim of our work is to investigate practicable ways in which such a market can be made to emerge and develop. The model takes an existing static formulation of a differentiated products market and generalizes it to include social interactions among different consumer classes, as well as time evolution over a finite horizon. In particular, we examine how an existing market changes in response to various influences, such as new (eco-) products becoming available. Social interactions play an important role in these changes. The analysis of the model is conducted considering multiple ¿personality¿ types of consumers, ranging from early to reluctunct adopters of the new product. The simulations show various consumer distribution outcomes over the product space and give insight as to how consumer demands for the environmentally friendly products can be influenced/increased over time. We also consider a dynamic game analysis perspective for pricing schemes of eco-products on markets simulated as above.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovation Diffusion and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207