Pseudoaneurysm as a Late Complication of Hybrid Aortic Arch Repair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hybrid aortic arch repair is increasingly used for the management of aortic arch aneurysm. Pseudoaneurysm is a newly described late complication of this procedure. A 57-year-old man underwent emergent supra-aortic debranching and aortic arch stent grafting after rupture of an arch aneurysm. Three years later, the patient presented with a pseudoaneurysm at the junction between the stent graft's proximal landing zone and the origin of the debranching graft. At reoperative repair, the proximal stent graft had eroded through the aortic wall at the junction of the endograft proximal landing zone and the proximal anastomosis of the debranching graft. The presence of a dilated, fragile ascending aorta at the initial procedure seemed to be a risk factor for development of the pseudoaneurysm. Replacement of the ascending aorta combined with supra-aortic debranching has become an accepted strategy in hybrid arch repair to establish a suitable landing zone for the endograft.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".