MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2548706059 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2016.7726610

Adaptive distributed compression technique utilizing intermediate network nodes

2016· article· en· W2548706059 on OpenAlexaff
Fuad Shamieh, Auon Muhammad Akhtar, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkNetwork traffic controlNetwork packetQuality of serviceNetwork congestionPacket lossNetwork performanceLatency (audio)Network delayReal-time computingQueueing theoryNetwork simulationDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data networks are experiencing an unprecedented growth in traffic resulting in a multitude of challenges including high network congestion, latency, and packet loss rates. These challenges greatly affect the performance of the network and have a drastic impact on the Quality of Service (QoS) for various applications. In order to reduce network congestion and in turn, maintain the desired QoS, an adaptive and distributed compression/decompression scheme is proposed. The proposed scheme performs the compression and decompression processes within the queues of the intermediate routing nodes of a network. The payload of a packet is compressed based on the packet queuing time. The average expected queuing time of packets is determined instantaneously within the intermediate nodes of a network by employing the Pollaczek Khinchin (PK) equation. Using Network Simulator 3 (NS3), the proposed scheme was simulated under different network conditions and compared with non-compressed transmission sessions of different flow rates. The simulation results show a dramatic improvement in network performance. More specifically, the number of lost packets and one way latency are reduced by at least 22.50% and 18%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207