MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2548735054 · doi:10.1049/iet-epa.2016.0454

Integrated model predictive control with reduced switching frequency for modular multilevel converters

2016· article· en· W2548735054 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Electric Power Applications · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsRockwell Automation (Canada)Toronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersModular designModel predictive controlSwitching frequencyControl theory (sociology)Control (management)Computer scienceControl engineeringElectronic engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The indirect model predictive control (I‐MPC) is one of the reduced computational predictive strategies, used to control the modular multilevel converter (MMC). This approach operates at higher switching frequency, which is not desirable for high‐power applications. This study proposes an integrated solution for MMC by combining predictive control with the classical energy balancing approach. To implement the predictive algorithm, a detailed three‐phase MMC model is presented. The three‐phase model includes the zero sequence voltage to reduce the switching frequency of submodules. In addition, the output power quality is enhanced, while operating at reduced switching frequency. The performance of integrated approach is experimentally validated on a laboratory prototype under balanced and unbalanced conditions. In addition, the performance of integrated approach is compared with the existing methodology in terms of output current ripple, switching frequency, computational complexity, and total harmonic distortion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it