MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2548735310 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2016.7726746

Orbital angular momentum (OAM) modes for 2-D beam-steering of circular arrays

2016· article· en· W2548735310 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAzimuthBeam steeringAngular momentumOpticsPhysicsCircular bufferMIMOAntenna (radio)Antenna arrayPhase (matter)Beam (structure)TelecommunicationsEngineeringComputer scienceBeamforming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the context of increasing the data-transmission capacity of next-generation wireless links using multi-input multi-output (MIMO) techniques involving antenna arrays, the concept of so-called orbital angular momentum (OAM) states or modes has attracted considerable attention. It is a concept borrowed from physics and optics, applied to much longer RF wavelengths, with the inevitable consequences of generally larger physical dimensions, so that the MIMO capacity is not achieved in a line of sight exceeding the Rayleigh distance from the antenna. However, it is recognized that OAM modes are readily generated by circular arrays with linear phase excitations, and are really the axial patterns of what were known as phase-modes used for steering beams or nulls of circular arrays in the azimuth dimension in past applications. Here the phase-modes of a circular array are used to steer its beam in both the azimuth and elevation dimensions, using 3 or 4 phase-shifters and 3 simple hybrids for an arbitrary number of array elements. The beam-steering is effected in the far field, in polar coordinates all around the array axis, and radially over 1 or 2 beam-widths. The radial range can be extended by combining higher-order phase-modes. Such OAM-based beam-steering means are particularly suited to backhaul links for small cells using mm-wave antennas in future 5G wireless networks. Because RF phase-shifters are expensive and do not scale well at millimeter wavelengths, their numbers must be minimized to fit them in the antenna structure and to keep down costs. The steering range is adequate to compensate for motion of small-cell mounting platforms which are typically nonrigid street fixtures such as sign- and lamp-posts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it