MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2548768179 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2016.7726625

Distributed generation long-term planning for voltage profile enhancements using optimal hourly operation conditions

2016· article· en· W2548768179 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersKing Abdulaziz University
KeywordsTerm (time)Computer scienceRepresentation (politics)Distributed generationVoltageMathematical optimizationInteger programmingInteger (computer science)Linear programmingOperational planningNonlinear systemOperation planningNonlinear programmingAlgorithmOperations researchEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An algorithm to optimize distributed generation allocation in a long-term planning problem to purposely enhance hourly voltage profile is presented. This algorithm deploys an hourly optimal operation to fit the long-term planning problem. It requires the consideration of several operational factors both explicitly or as a byproduct. The complexity level of the problem and the degree of representation of variables (accuracy) necessitated the mixed integer nonlinear programming formulation. Case studies are performed to validate the proposed algorithm. Results confirm the potential benefits of the algorithm especially for distribution utilities interested in knowing the time, type (technology), location and size of DG units that can enhance voltage profile in an operational level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207