MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2548860952 · doi:10.1109/cvrs.2012.6421281

Integration of GIS/RS/GPS for urban fire response

2012· article· en· W2548860952 on OpenAlexaff
Zhinong Zhong, Jing Ning, WU Qiu-yun, Yang Gao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSimulation and Modeling Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemGeographic information systemComputer scienceInterface (matter)Distributed GISSystems architectureSystems engineeringRemote sensingArchitectureAM/FM/GISGIS applicationsReal-time computingGeographyEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integration of Geographic Information System (GIS), Remote Sensing (RS) and Global Positioning System (GPS) technologies can extend the capability of fire management systems. These technologies are increasingly being used by modern urban fire emergency response systems. This paper describes a system framework based on GIS/RS/GPS technologies for urban fire response, which includes a real-time positioning system, a remote sensing image system and powerful functions for spatial display, operation and analysis. The framework from system components, architecture and functions of integrating GIS/RS/GPS in urban fire response is described. A prototype system built based on the framework has been developed and its spatial data organization, system functionalities and user interface are also be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSimulation and Modeling ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207