Fault-Tolerant Formation Control of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in the Presence of Actuator Faults and Obstacles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a leader-follower type of fault-tolerant formation control (FTFC) methodology with application to multiple unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the presence of actuator failures and potential collisions. The proposed FTFC scheme consists of both outer-loop and inner-loop controllers. First, a leader-follower control scheme with integration of a collision avoidance mechanism is designed as the outer-loop controller for guaranteeing UAVs to keep the desired formation while avoiding the approaching obstacles. Then, an active fault-tolerant control (FTC) strategy for counteracting the actuator failures and also for preventing the healthy actuators from saturation is synthesized as the inner-loop controller. Finally, a group of numerical simulations are carried out to verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it