Response surface methodology based optimization of surface PM machine incorporating stator slotting and PM sizing effects to extend the operating limits for direct-drive EV application
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Direct-drive electric vehicle motors have requirements such as high-torque, low-speed and a constant power speed range (CPSR) between 3 and 5 depending on the tire size. Furthermore, these motors must deliver lower cogging torque and torque ripple when compared to conventional electric vehicle high-speed motors due to absence of any damping mechanism. Surface permanent magnet synchronous machines (SPMSMs) with distributed winding configuration are found to favor the aforementioned characteristics for the above application. However, in spite of the lower CPSR requirements for direct-drive application, SPMSMs suffer from poor flux weakening operation. Various rotor structural modifications as well as optimal PM sizing solutions are proposed in literature. However, they fail to take into account the stator slotting effect which significantly affects the flux weakening operation of the machine. Thus, in order to alleviate the challenges involved in realizing a SPMSM as a direct-drive motor, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is implemented with magnet size and stator slot dimensions as design variables in an effort to optimize the characteristic current and further enhance the CPSR of the machine. Finite element models of the optimal machine are used to verify the output power- and torque-speed characteristics over entire operating range calculated from analytical equations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".