Funerary Rites in the Royalist Exile: George Morley's Ministry in Antwerp, 1650-1653
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les chercheurs ont récemment porté leur attention davantage sur les exilés royalistes et ont analysé une grande variété d’écrits laïcs et dévotionnels contemporains. Il n’y a cependant eu aucun examen approfondi d’un aspect de l’exil, fortement chargé politiquement, qui donne accès aux principaux dispositifs de survie de la résistance royaliste et anglicane sur le continent, c’est-à-dire, les rites funéraires. À travers l’analyse de la législation parlementaire et en particulier du ministère de George Morley à Anvers (1650–1653), cet essai tente de saisir les implications de l’utilisation continue par les exilés du Burial Office of the Book of Common Prayer, révélant ainsi dans quelle mesure la subversion royaliste était autant dirigée vers les forces hostiles à l’étranger que dans leur pays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".