Plants, fungi, and freeloaders: examining temporal changes in the “taxonomic richness” of endophytic fungi in the dwarf mistletoe <i>Arceuthobium americanum</i> over its growing season
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arceuthobium americanum Nutt. ex Engelm. (lodgepole pine dwarf mistletoe) is a dioecious plant parasitizing conifers in North America. Here, we documented changes in the “taxonomic richness” of culturable endophytic fungi in male and female A. americanum over the growing season. Endophytic fungi were isolated from vegetative stems of surface-sterilized aerial shoots from male and female A. americanum collected weekly from April to September. Isolated fungi were characterized macroscopically, generating a database of 48 morphologically unique forms that likely represented individual taxa. A random sample of endophytic fungi was sequenced to determine identity based on ITS rDNA. Richness increased throughout the growing season similarly in the stems of both sexes, suggesting that increased developmental age or time in the environment facilitates an increase in endophyte richness: male and female endophyte communities were 91% similar based on Sorensen’s coefficient. Sequenced endophytes came from many diverse taxa, including Serpula, Alternaria, and Tremella, which may function as mutualistic symbionts within the mistletoe. An increase in fungal richness throughout the growing season has been observed in all flowering plants examined to date, although our observation is the first for the genus and for parasitic plants in general, and has also contributed to knowledge of fungal diversity in dioecious plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".