MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2548982118

The Case for an Adaptive Integration Framework for Data Aggregation/Dissemination in Service-Oriented Architectures

2009· article· en· W2548982118 on OpenAlexaff
Dennis M. Moen, Lynn Meredith-Lockheed Martin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProvisioningDistributed computingQuality of serviceComputer networkResource (disambiguation)Service (business)Wireless ad hoc networkResource management (computing)WirelessTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The migration to Service Oriented Architectures (SOA) implies many real-time applications distributed across large geographic areas with highly mobile users and sensors that require exchange of critical data among local as well as distant users across resource constrained networks. These emerging applications can be characterized as distributed collaborative adaptive systems. They are likely to rely on ad hoc wireless networks particularly in military and emergency response applications for transport of critical information and in many cases in multimedia form. Users of these systems are likely to have different needs or views of sensor data either because of organizational role or geographic location. In this distributed architecture, available resources must dynamically reconfigure themselves to respond to external factors such as changes in the environment, changes in short-term objectives, reallocation of responsibilities, and changes in information flow patterns. This paper describes a framework for dynamic resource management (DRM) and Quality of Service (QoS) in support of network aware applications and resiliency in ad hoc delay tolerant networking (DTN). The proposed framework is based on managing perflow, end-to-end provisioning of heterogeneous network resources in support of mission-driven resource management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant NetworksFrench-language works237,207