MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) Management at Foothills Medical Centre: A Retrospective Analysis Between 2005-2010 (Tertiary Centre, Calgary)

2015· article· en· W2549128571 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gwynivere A Davies, Karen Valentine, Zahra Goodarzi, Farzana Sayani

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraMicroangiopathic hemolytic anemiaThrombotic microangiopathyPediatricsRituximabInternal medicineADAMTS13Retrospective cohort studyIncidence (geometry)Disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract TTP is a rare condition of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia with a reported incidence of 4 cases per million people. Untreated mortality is reported to be as high as 90%; plasma exchange (PLEX) has significantly reduced this to 28%. Given the heterogeneity in presentation and severity at diagnosis, there is a wide range of practice with regards to exchanges, management of refractory disease and relapse. The British Committee for Standards in Hematology (BCSH) released clinical guidelines first in 2003, updated in 2012 outlining evidence based approach to practice. Our goal was to examine clinical practices and effect on outcomes at our tertiary centre during 2005-2010, between release of the first and second edition guidelines. Patients were retrospectively identified by searching for the TTP diagnostic code with admission dates between 2005-2010. They were excluded if they were not primarily treated in Calgary, or their thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) was felt to be due to another diagnosis. Thirty eight patients were identified, with an average age of 48.8 years, and mostly female (men=8 patients, 21%). Ten patients were excluded for alternate diagnoses or main treatment outside Calgary. TTP was classified as primary in 15/45 (39%), and in 33 patients (87%) this was their first episode. Secondary causes included underlying autoimmune disease (24% of patients), malignancy (16% of patients), and pregnancy (4% of patients). 4% of patients were receiving active chemotherapy at the time of diagnosis of TTP. ADAMTS13 level and inhibitor (antibodies) were only examined in 10 cases (26%), and reported in fewer. Measurement of antigen, activity and inhibitors is strongly emphasized in the literature for accurate diagnosis of TTP compared with hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), other TMA or congenital TTP, and this was underutilized in this tertiary centre likely due to laboratory availability. Duration in hospital was often long, with an average of 29 days. This is likely due to the frequency of refractory disease, seen in more than half of patients (23/38, 61%). 24% of cases were fatal; this result is consistent with previously reported mortality rates in the era of PLEX. 5 of 9 fatalities were associated with malignancy where there is felt to be no benefit from PLEX, although interestingly 2 patients with malignancy received 5 to 7 days of PLEX, recovered and were discharged from hospital. Two fatalities had a delay of 48 hours or more to initiation of PLEX through misdiagnosis, one developed severe neurologic symptoms during line placement and the other presented atypically with hematuria. The most common complications of TTP included bleeding (16 patients, 42%), neurologic changes without stroke (16 patients, 42%), requirement for hemodialysis (9 patients, 24%), and radiologically identified stroke (6 patients, 16%). 35 patients (92%) received PLEX, and the average number of days on PLEX was 16. Twice daily exchange at initiation or exacerbation was common (29%), as were tapers (60%), although literature now suggests tapering does not reduce relapses. Steroids are recommended in most cases for immunosuppression; only 21 of our patients (55%) received these in hospital. Secondary immunosuppression was occasionally instituted in refractory or relapsing cases including cyclophosphamide (13 patients, 34%), rituximab (5 patients, 13%), mycophenolate mofetil and vincristine (1 patient each, 3%). Rituximab is now routinely used in initial treatment to decrease relapses, for refractory disease, and occasionally as prophylaxis with low ADAMTS13 in asymptomatic patients, and other agents generally recommended against given its efficacy and safety, but this was not standardized in our group. Limitations for this project include small patient numbers, the change in definitions of HUS, TMA and TTP over time, and the retrospective nature of patient selection and data collection. In summary, diagnostic and treatment strategies for TTP have become significantly more standardized in the past 10 years. A protocolized strategy for initial investigations, PLEX and immunosuppressive therapies in line with previously published guidelines would be useful in our institution, potentially reduce relapses and improve rapidity of patient response, however our mortality statistics appear similar to those previously published. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207