MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2549190761 · doi:10.2991/itmr.2016.6.2.3

Big Data Applications in Businesses: An Overview

2016· article· en· W2549190761 on OpenAlexaff
Raza Ur Rehman Qazi, Ali Sher

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Technology Management Review · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataData scienceBusinessComputer scienceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many businesses are implementing big data applications to improve efficiency and performance; and reduce costs and resource consumption. As digitization has become an integral part of everyday life, data collection has resulted in the accumulation of huge amounts of data that can be used in various beneficial application domains. Effective analysis and utilization of big data is a key factor for success in many businesses. This paper reviews the applications of big data to support businesses in key areas including E-Commerce, Human Resources, Customer Relationship Management, and Accounting. The review reveals that big data concepts are being used successfully and businesses have harvested it benefits both in financial and non-financial terms. The competitive nature of businesses that have emerged from enabled insight prompts for every business to ensure that they reap meaningful information from the internet and use it to create a business opportunity. Consequently, the significance of big data in developing value that can be turned to a potential commercial gap, created from insight, which can be exploited remains an area that has limited exploration from analytics in the discipline. It remains critical to evaluate the efficient business insight strategies that can be developed to ensure an optimized value addition that is based on accurate insight from the wild count of data source. Additionally, the study reveals that several opportunities are available for utilizing Big Data in different types of businesses; however, there are still many issues and challenges to be addressed to achieve better utilization of this technology. Consequently, there is much that remain unexplored on efficient Big Data approaches that can be used to gain value for business, especially now a time of acute business competition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.236
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Technology Management ReviewSame topicBig Data and Business IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207