MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2549193304 · doi:10.2118/183161-ms

Using Small-Scale Gas to Liquids Technology for Flare Gas Mitigation

2016· article· en· W2549193304 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Conrad Ayasse, Rob Ayasse

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicOil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSteam reformingGas to liquidsScope (computer science)Emerging technologiesPresentation (obstetrics)Natural gasHydrogen technologiesSyngasProcess (computing)Process engineeringComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceEngineeringWaste managementNanotechnologyHydrogen productionHydrogenChemistryMaterials scienceHydrogen economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objectives/Scope The objective of the paper is three-fold. First, to present an overview of the challenges traditional synthesis gas reforming methods pose for efficient Gas to Liquids conversion. The second objective is to show how newly emerging reformer technologies, such as those based on plasma or catalytic partial oxidation, will provide significant improvements. Third, a case will be made for how these new technologies, when paired with a high-efficiency Fischer-Tropsch process, will finally provide oil and gas operators with a genuinely profitable alternative to the environmentally damaging, and wasteful practice, of faring or venting Associated Gas. Methods, Procedures, Process The presentation will start with an overview of the current "state of the art" where Gas to Liquids technologies are concerned. This section will highlight the key challenges posed by the traditional synthesis gas reforming technologies, which are steam reforming and auto-thermal reforming. In particular, the specific difficulties they pose for offshore Gas to Liquids deployment will be emphasized. The second part of the presentation will use the case study method to outline how two newly emerging technologies, glid-arc plasma reforming, and Catalytic Partial Oxidation reforming, address those key challenges and shortcomings. This will be based on recent research and testing performed by our technology development partner, the Canada Chemical Corporation. The third part of the presentation will demonstrate how these new technologies, when paired with a highly efficient Fischer-Tropsch reactor, can significantly increase the natural gas to diesel conversion ratio, and thereby deliver vastly improved customer value, even at relatively small scale (1 MMSCFD and less.) This leap forward in Gas to Diesel (GTD) efficiency will therefore finally provide oil and gas operators with a genuinely profitable alternative to the harmful, and wasteful, practice of flaring and venting Associated Gas. Moreover, careful design and packaging of GTD units using these new technologies will also reduce their weight and footprint sufficiently to make them deployable on offshore oil platforms, with a only a minimum of adaptation required to existing infrastructure. Results, Observations, Conclusions The results showcased in the presentation will be based on two years of computer modelling and lab-testing. They will demonstrate that the new syngas reforming technologies have the potential to enhance conversion output by at least 25%. The conclusion is that these new technologies will finally usher in an era where GTL/GTD conversion units will deliver excellent customer value, even at small scale. This in turn will provide a much needed profitable alternative to flaring, venting or re-injecting Associated Gas. Novel/Additive Information The newly emerging syngas technologies are not well known in the petroleum technology industry, nor are the significant benefits that will accrue from their commercialization. We will take the opportunity of this presentation to address that knowledge gap.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.481

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOil, Gas, and Environmental IssuesFrench-language works237,207