MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2549258072

Mapping the Belly River Group in Alberta

2010· article· en· W2549258072 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P Glombick, B. Hathway, Shilong Mei, Christopher J. Banks, Duncan Hay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGroup (periodic table)Clastic rockPaleontologyForeland basinStructural basinGeomorphology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Belly River Group represents a westward-thickening, third-order clastic sequence deposited within the Western Canadian Foreland Basin during the Campanian. In southern and southcentral Alberta, the Belly River Group has been divided into the Foremost, Oldman, and Dinosaur Park formations. The Dinosaur Park Formation thins from west to east and is separated from the underlying Oldman Formation by a regional discontinuity that can be mapped over much of central and southern Alberta (Eberth and Hamblin, 1993; Hamblin, 1997a). The Oldman Formation can be subdivided into an upper, fine-grained “silt unit” and a lower sandstone unit (Hamblin, 1997b). The sandstone unit overlies the Taber coal zone, which situated at the top of the Foremost Formation, where present. In eastern Alberta, there is a complex interfingering between nonmarine and marginal marine rocks of the lower Belly River Group and fine-grained marine rocks of the Lea Park Formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→