Superb Lyrebird Menura novaehollandiae Nesting in Sherbrooke Forest, 1974 to 1996
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The field reports of the Sherbrooke Lyrebird Survey Group were abstracted for details of Lyrebird nesting for the years 1974 to 1996. There were 107 nests brought to apparent completion, which were classified into those that were low (ground level to 1.5 m), intermediate (greater than 1.5 m and up to 4 m) and high (greater than 4 m). The analysis was confined principally to the low group where the nesting events could be followed most effectively. However, analysis of the success rate indicated that there was no statistical difference between the three groups. In the low group the success rate was 39 fledged chicks from 66 nests with eggs (59%). There was a hatching failure of 18/24 eggs in the low group. In 11 instances the egg was removed from the nest, in most cases by a predator, in four the egg was infertile or death in ovo occurred and in two cases the egg was abandoned. In the low group there were five cases of predation of the chick in the nest and one of predation of the parent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".