MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2549299592 · doi:10.1142/s2251171716410014

A Decade of Developing Radio-Astronomy Instrumentation using CASPER Open-Source Technology

2016· article· en· W2549299592 on OpenAlexaff
J. Hickish, Zuhra Abdurashidova, Zaki S. Ali, Kaushal D. Buch, Sandeep C. Chaudhari, Hong Chen, Matthew R. Dexter, R. S. Domagalski, John Ford, Griffin Foster, David L. George, Joe Greenberg, L. J. Greenhill, A. R. Isaacson, Homin Jiang, Glenn Jones, F. Kapp, Henno Kriel, Rich Lacasse, Andrew Lutomirski, David H. E. MacMahon, Jason Manley, A. Martens, Randy McCullough, Mekhala Muley, W. S. New, Aaron R. Parsons, Rurik A. Primiani, Jason Ray, Andrew Siemion, V. Van Tonder, Laura Vertatschitsch, Mark Wagner, Jonathan Weintroub, Dan Werthimer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Astronomical Instrumentation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsVendorScientific instrumentInstrumentation (computer programming)Computer scienceSoftwareRadio astronomyElectronicsTelecommunicationsSystems engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringAstronomyOperating systemBusinessPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Collaboration for Astronomy Signal Processing and Electronics Research (CASPER) has been working for a decade to reduce the time and cost of designing, building and deploying new digital radio-astronomy instruments. Today, CASPER open-source technology powers over 45 scientific instruments worldwide, and is used by scientists and engineers at dozens of academic institutions. In this paper, we catalog the current offerings of the CASPER collaboration, and instruments past and present built by CASPER users and developers. We describe the ongoing state of software development, as CASPER looks to support a broader range of programming environments and hardware and ensure compatibility with the latest vendor tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.035
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.064
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0350.064
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.017
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0020.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations143
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Astronomical InstrumentationSame topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207