Exploring the multi-stakeholder experience in Kenya
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper attempts to explore the extent to which the multi-stakeholder model has contributed to the vibrant information and communications technology (ICT) sector in Kenya. It shows how stakeholder organisation and lobbying, as well as political decisions, influenced the innovation and diffusion of ICTs, and how the multi-stakeholder approach gained support from both governmental and non-governmental players in the ICT sector. The paper highlights socio-political dynamics and changes that have taken place, which have led to the multi-stakeholder approach being applied in order to develop ICT policies and create new institutions deploying infrastructure, rollout, and management. It also explores how the multi-stakeholder partnership (MSP) approach has been applied to the discussion and regulation of post-access issues. This paper is based on interviews, the author’s broad experience in this area, and reviews of Kenya ICT Action Network documents, as well as mailing list discussions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it