MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2549359846 · doi:10.1111/jpm.12364

Learning Disability Nursing in Secure Settings: working with complexity

2017· editorial· en· W2549359846 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amy L. Lovell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · 2017
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDown syndrome and intellectual disability research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Learning disabilityPsychological interventionMental healthInstitutionalisationHealth carePopulationNursingPolitical scienceMedicinePhenomenonPsychologyPublic relationsEconomic growthPsychiatryGeographyLawEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal editorial to accompany an article published in the same journal. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Lovell, A. (2017). Learning disability nursing in secure settings: Working with complexity. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 24(1), 1-3. DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12364, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpm.12364/full. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0210.037
Scholarly communication0.0290.039
Open science0.0060.049
Research integrity0.0080.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychiatric and Mental Health NursingSame topicDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchFrench-language works237,207