MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2549530510 · doi:10.3138/tjt.4202i

La liberté religieuse au concile Vatican <scp>II</scp> et depuis

2016· article· fr· W2549530510 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gilles Routhier

Bibliographic record

VenueToronto Journal of Theology · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La reconnaissance de la liberté de la personne humaine et des communautés en matière religieuse est un des acquis majeurs de Vatican II. Cet enseignement, qui renouvelait le discours de l'Église catholique en cette matière, n'a pas été acquis facilement lors du concile. Depuis, cet enseignement a montré des limites dans un contexte profondément marqué par le pluralisme religieux, des violences commises au nom de la religion et des replis identitaires conséquents. S'appuyant sur la dignité de la personne humaine et argumentant à partir d'une conception que l'on croyait commune et partagée de la nature humaine et d'une définition de la religion qui apparaît à plusieurs aujourd'hui comme trop occidentale, le droit civil à la liberté religieuse reconnu par le concile fait aujourd'hui à nouveau débat et appelle de nouveaux approfondissements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueToronto Journal of TheologySame topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207