MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2549550066 · doi:10.1017/s174392131201109x

NGC 5128 - a nearby laboratory for planetary nebulae in a giant early-type galaxy

2011· article· en· W2549550066 on OpenAlexaff
J. R. Walsh, George H. Jacoby, H. Kuntschner, R. F. Peletier, M. Rejkuba, N. A. Walton, Kristin A. Woodley

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Astronomical Union · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstrophysicsPhysicsPlanetary nebulaAstronomyGalaxyPopulationPhotoionizationEmission spectrumMetallicityNebulaDoubly ionized oxygenStellar populationElliptical galaxySpectral lineStar formationStarsIonization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract NGC 5128 at 3.8 Mpc is the nearest large elliptical galaxy and is ideally suited to a detailed study of its planetary nebula population. Two spectroscopic programmes are summarised. More than 1200 PNe candidates are known from imaging campaigns in NGC 5128 and accurate radial velocities of 1070 have been measured with the VLT FLAMES/Giraffe spectrometer. From these data a variety of studies of the galaxy kinematics are enabled, such as search for PN sub-groups, representing the relics of accretion of small galaxies. Emission line spectra were observed with VLT FORS and the light element abundances determined for 40 PNe through photoionization modelling. A spread in O abundance of about 0.9 dex is found but no obvious radial gradient out to 19 kpc. Comparison of the O abundance from these PN with the metallicity for the stellar population in the neighbourhood of the PN will probe the star formation and enrichment history of the galaxy. Full results from this analysis will be presented in a forthcoming paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Astronomical UnionSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207