MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2549556106 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2014.7048540

Conservative DC voltage prediction of floating capacitor H-bridge converters for soft start of grid connected induction motors

2014· article· en· W2549556106 on OpenAlexafffund
R. Ul Haque, Nirmana Perera, John Salmon, Andrew M. Knight

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsCapacitorConvertersVoltageInduction motorDecoupling capacitorOvershoot (microwave communication)Squirrel-cage rotorDC motorEngineeringReservoir capacitorElectrical engineeringComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A methodology is described to conservatively predict the behavior of DC capacitor voltage for floating capacitor H-bridge converters, which are located in each phase between the utility grid and a squirrel cage induction motor. Under the proposed methodology, an algorithm is developed to predict the DC voltage level before motor starting. In this way, DC capacitor voltage overshoot problem can be avoided, which greatly improves the safety and reliability of the proposed power electronics. The paper presents the theory necessary to understand how to model AC bridge voltage trend under various motor loading conditions and how to conservatively predict the behavior of DC capacitor voltage before motor starting. Hardware experimental results show that the voltage level of DC capacitor for the proposed system can be accurately predicted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207