MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2549690670 · doi:10.4095/211098

Quartzite sequences and their relationships, Woodburn Lake group, western Churchill Province, Nunavut

2000· report· en· W2549690670 on OpenAlexaffabout
E Zaleski, S J Pehrsson, N Duke, W J Davis, R L'Heureux, E Greiner, J A Kerswill

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcheanConglomerateGeologyGroup (periodic table)GeochemistryPebbleSedimentary rockKyaniteBanded iron formationUltramafic rockPlacer miningGreenstone beltSedimentary structuresMetamorphic rockPaleontologyStructural basinFacies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Archean orthoquartzite units of the Woodburn Lake group are part of a diverse volcanic and volcanogenic sedimentary package, in contrast to the cratonic sedimentary rocks of the Paleoproterozoic Amer group. Woodburn Lake quartzite is interbedded with pyritic quartz-pebble conglomerate, chloritoid-kyanite slate, and iron-formation, none of which have been described from the Amer group. Pyritic conglomerate presents a potential for paleoplacer and modified placer gold, which could have had a local source in underlying mineralized volcanic and sedimentary rocks. The presence of pyritic conglomerate is consistent with deposition in the reducing atmosphere characteristic of Archean time and may prove to be a diagnostic tool for discriminating Archean from Paleoproterozoic quartzite successions in the region. Archean ultramafic rocks and gossanous iron-formation can be traced discontinuously south of the Amer belt, considerably extending the strike-length of the suite, which is known to host gold occurrences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207