MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Studies in C4b-Deficient Mice Provide Further Evidence That Complement Cascade Orchestrates the Mobilization of Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells.

2012· article· en· W2549870470 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Janowska‐Wieczorek, Leah A. Marquez‐Curtis, Danila Leontyev, Donald R. Branch, Janina Ratajczak, Mariusz Z. Ratajczak

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCanadian Blood ServicesUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaematopoiesisProgenitor cellCell biologyComplement systemComplement membrane attack complexBone marrowStem cellMobilizationAnaphylatoxinChemistryBiologyImmunologyImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2316 Introduction: Complement cascade (CC) and innate immunity have emerged as important modulators of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) trafficking. We reported that the CC becomes activated in bone marrow (BM) during HSPC mobilization induced by G-CSF or AMD3100 and proposed that the generation of C5a and C5b-C9 (membrane attack complex; MAC) is required for optimal mobilization (Stem Cells 2007; 25:3093; Leukemia 2010; 24:976). While C5a induces a proteolytic microenvironment in BM that attenuates SDF-1-CXCR4 retention signals for HSPC and promotes egress of leucocytes, C5b-C9 (MAC) induces the release of a crucial chemoattractant, sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P), from red blood cells and augments mobilization of HSPC from BM. On the other hand, C3 cleavage fragments attenuate mobilization by enhancing responsiveness of HSPC to SDF-1 retention signals thus promoting HSPC retention in BM. Thus our findings suggest that mobilization is differently regulated by the proximal and distal parts of CC (upstream and downstream of C3, respectively). We also demonstrated that C3-deficient mice (lacking C3 cleavage fragments) are easy mobilizers whereas C5-deficient mice (lacking C5 cleavage fragments and not generating MAC) mobilize HSPC very poorly (Leukemia 2009; 23:2052). C4 is part of the classical pathway of CC whose activation/cleavage is initiated by C1 and C2, releasing smaller (C4a and C2b) and larger (C4b and C2a) fragments. C2a binds with C4b to form an enzymatic complex termed C3 convertase that cleaves C3 into C3a anaphylatoxin and C3b. Aim of Study: In the present study we investigated the role of C4 in HSPC mobilization and hypothesized that C4-deficient mice are easy mobilizers, supporting the notion that the proximal part of CC is crucial for retention of HSPC in the BM microenvironment. Experimental Approach: We employed 6–8 week old C4b-deficient mice (strain B6.129S-C4btm1Crr/J from Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbour, ME) and wild type (WT) littermates. Mice were injected subcutaneously with 250 μg/kg of human recombinant G-CSF (Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) or saline (control) daily for 3 days. At 6 h after the last G-CSF injection, the mice were sacrificed and blood was collected from the vena cavae. Mobilization was evaluated by determining the number of leukocytes (WBC) and colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophages (CFU-GM) circulating in the peripheral blood (PB). We also measured the level of mouse terminal complement complex C5b-C9 (MAC) in plasma using ELISA (Kamiya) in G-CSF-mobilized and non-mobilized C4b-deficient and WT mice. Results: We found that C4b-deficient mice treated with saline have slightly higher WBC counts than WT mice and that G-CSF induced a greater increase in WBC counts in these mice than in WT mice. Based on CFU-GM counts after G-CSF mobilization, C4b-deficient mice mobilized significantly more HSPCs into PB than WT mice (p < 0.0065). These observations were consistent in all four experiments performed involving 18–20 mice per experiment. The G-CSF mobilization responses correlated with a greater increase in activation of the distal part of CC in C4b-deficient mice compared to WT mice, as evidenced by C5b-C9 levels evaluated by ELISA. Conclusions: Our data indicate that C4-deficient mice are easy mobilizers, thus supporting a role for the proximal part of CC in retention of HSPC in BM. Furthermore, mobilization of HSPC in C4b-deficient mice correlated with activation of the distal part of CC and generation of C5b-C9 (MAC) suggesting that activation of the distal part of CC is crucial for egress of HSPCs into PB. Moreover, activation of the distal part of CC in C4-deficient mice that have defective activation of the proximal part of CC indicates that C5 may be cleaved in a C3-independent manner by other proteolytic enzymes present in blood plasma. Finally, our data further support that mobilization is part of a more general immune response in which all complement components, including C4, play a significant role. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses→French-language works237,207→