Identification of Cytogenetically Normal Human CD34+CD38+ Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells from Inv(16)+ Leukemic Bone Marrow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract For many subtypes of AML including cases with the inv(16), mutations that give rise to the leukemic phenotype occur, at least in part, in the hematopoietic stem/progenitor (HSPC) cell subset, as suggested by studies showing that primitive CD34+ CD38- bone marrow cells can function as leukemia-initiating cells (LIC) when transferred into immunodeficient mice. A significant challenge has been that LIC share many of the same cell-surface markers as their normal HSPC counterparts, thus making it difficult to purify and functionally characterize either subset from the bulk bone marrow of leukemia patients. Here we report the FACS analysis of several previously reported human LIC markers on bone marrow samples from inv(16) AML patients and show that a combination of TIM3, CLL1, and CD33 can significantly enrich for a rare population of CD34+ CD38- cells that lack the inv(16) fusion mRNA when tested by nested RT-PCR. Heterogeneous expression of these markers among different patient samples often causes incomplete elimination of the fusion mRNA when FACS-sorting the CD34+ CD38- population as single TIM3-, CLL1-, or CD33- subsets. The combination of TIM3 with CLL1 and/or CD33 leads to a more consistent elimination of the fusion mRNA from the FACS-sorted CD34+ CD38- subsets. Results from methylcellulose assays showed that the TIM3- CLL1- CD33- subset of CD34+CD38- cells could form multiple colony types, including CFU-GEMM, that were all negative for the fusion mRNA by RT-PCR. In contrast, colonies derived from bulk bone marrow were all positive for the fusion mRNA. The TIM3- CLL1- CD33- subset of CD34+CD38- cells displayed greater than 600-fold enrichment for progenitor activity compared to bulk bone marrow but did not form additional colonies upon serial re-plating. These results have important implications for the therapeutic targeting of inv(16)+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in patients with relapsed and refractory disease and for purification of normal HSPC from leukemic bone marrow samples. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".