MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2549914731 · doi:10.1002/gj.2876

Multistage dolomitization in the Qal'eh Dokhtar Formation (Middle‐Upper Jurassic), Central Iran: petrographic and geochemical evidence

2016· article· en· W2549914731 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersFerdowsi University of MashhadAmerican Academy of Sleep MedicineUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsDolomiteDolomitizationPetrographyGeologyCarbonateDiagenesisSiliciclasticMineralogyCalciteAnhydriteGeochemistryCarbonate platformThin sectionPaleontologyFaciesChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The late Jurassic Qal'eh Dokhtar Formation lithologically comprises three parts, from bottom to top, a lower sandstone unit, middle shale unit and an upper carbonate unit, which extend in a N–S direction over a wide area to the east of the Shotori Range and west of the Lut Block (Central Iran). This succession was deposited on a mixed carbonate–siliciclastic ramp. Carbonate rocks of the Qal'eh Dokhtar Formation vary from undolomitized, to partly dolomitized, to completely dolomitized. Field observations from two measured sections (the type section, 955 m thick, and the Sorond section, 639 m thick), combined with detailed petrographic and geochemical analyses, revealed the diverse types of dolomite in this formation. Five types of replacement dolomite and one type of dolomite cement were distinguished. Replacement dolomites (RD) consist of: (1) fine crystalline planar‐s (RD1); (2) medium crystalline planar‐s (RD2); (3) medium crystalline planar‐e (RD3); (4) coarse crystalline planar‐s (RD4); and (5) coarse crystalline planar‐e (RD5). Coarse crystalline planar dolomite cements (DC) were observed in low abundance and filling dissolution voids and fractures. Variation in dolomite types is mainly related to early to late diagenetic processes leading to changes in composition of the dolomitizing fluids. Replacement dolomites are non‐stoichiometric (Ca 43‐56 –Mg 34‐45 ) with Sr, Mn and Fe concentrations of 41–138 ppm, 168–919 ppm and 5000–21000 ppm, respectively. These dolomites are characterized by δ 18 O values ranging from 0.0 to –11.8 ‰ VPDB and δ 13 C values of +1.1 to +3.2 ‰ VPDB. These values are depleted in δ 18 O relative to the postulated values for late Jurassic dolomites precipitated in equilibrium with seawater, while δ 13 C values are within the range of Jurassic seawater dolomite values. Fluid inclusion data of RD4, RD5 and DC yield homogenization temperatures of 72 to 118 °C. Based on petrographic, fluid inclusion microthermometric data and geochemical results, the replacement dolomites in the Qal'eh Dokhtar Formation are interpreted to have formed in the subsurface at shallow to intermediate burial depths. These dolomites were then recrystallized at increased burial depths and temperatures. Seawater was the major source of Mg 2+ for early diagenetic dolomite (DR1), while Mg 2+ for late diagenetic dolomites was provided from diagenesis of clay minerals in shales and mechanical compaction of mudstone in the Qal'eh Dokhtar Formation. The dolomite cement is postdated by coarsely crystalline mosaic calcite cement indicating that diagenetic fluids eventually became undersaturated with respect to dolomite and oversaturated with respect to calcite. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it