MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mapping Extreme Rainfall Statistics for Canada under Climate Change Using Updated Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves

2016· article· en· W2550231465 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Slobodan P. Simonović, André Schardong, Dan Sandink

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsCanadian Chiropractic AssociationWestern University
FundersCanadian Water Network
KeywordsDownscalingPrecipitationEnvironmental scienceClimatologyClimate changeQuantileExtreme value theoryBaseline (sea)Intensity (physics)StatisticsMeteorologyMathematicsGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change is expected to alter the frequency and intensity of extreme rainfall events, affecting the rainfall intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) curve information used in the design, maintenance, and operation of water infrastructure in Canada. Presented in this study are analyses of precipitation data from 567 Environment Canada hydro-meteorological stations using the web-based IDF_CC tool, which applies a novel equidistance quantile-matching downscaling method to generate future IDF curve information. Results for the year 2100 based on The Second Generation Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM2) and a multimodel ensemble median of 24 global climate models (GCMs) were generated. A natural neighbor spatial interpolation method was used to generate results for ungauged locations. One in 5-year, 2-h and one in 100-year, 24-h precipitation events were explored. Results based on CanESM2 indicated a reduction in extreme precipitation in central regions of Canada under specific analyses and increases in other regions. Relative to the multimodel ensemble median approach, the CanESM2 results suggested more spatial variability in change of IDFs, and the ensemble median generated generally lower values than CanESM2. By using the median value that lowers the importance of extreme outputs, the ensemble median approach obscured uncertainty associated with GCM outputs. While the IDF_CC tool helps fill an important gap related to accessing local climate change information, it is important to consider uncertainty in GCM outputs when making climate change adaptation decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Resources Planning and ManagementSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207