Maternal cardiac function after HELLP syndrome: an echocardiography study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate maternal hemodynamics in asymptomatic women with a previous pregnancy affected by hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome and compare the findings to those of women with previous pre-eclampsia (PE) and controls with a previous uncomplicated pregnancy. METHODS: Women with a history of PE (n = 60) or HELLP syndrome (n = 49) and matched healthy controls (n = 60) underwent echocardiography at 6 months to 4 years after delivery, recording left ventricular (LV) dimensions, ejection fraction (LVEF) and mass, right ventricular (RV) tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and fractional area change (FAC). Diastolic filling (E/A and E/E' ratios) and tissue Doppler imaging were evaluated for both ventricles and the myocardial performance index was calculated. RESULTS: Only women with previous HELLP syndrome showed significant LV concentric hypertrophy (20.4%). However, in both HELLP and PE groups, LV concentric remodeling (46.9% and 46.7%, respectively), diastolic dysfunction (expressed as altered E/A and E/E' ratios) and reduced LVEF (14.3% and 21.7%, respectively) were documented. RV variables did not differ significantly between cases and controls, except for FAC and E/E' ratio, which were slightly impaired in women with previous HELLP syndrome compared to those with previous PE (16.3% vs 10.0%, P = 0.04; 14.3% vs 3.3%, P = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The significant overlap of echocardiographic features in women with previous PE and HELLP syndrome suggests that these two conditions share the same pathophysiology. However, HELLP syndrome may lead to more severe cardiovascular remodeling in the short to medium term after delivery. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".